<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pope sacks astronomer over evolution debate &#124; the Daily Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lr2.com/archives/2006/08/24/pope-sacks-astronomer-over-evolution-debate-the-daily-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lr2.com/archives/2006/08/24/pope-sacks-astronomer-over-evolution-debate-the-daily-mail/</link>
	<description>Just another  weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://lr2.com/archives/2006/08/24/pope-sacks-astronomer-over-evolution-debate-the-daily-mail/#comment-4377</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lr2.com/archives/2006/08/24/pope-sacks-astronomer-over-evolution-debate-the-daily-mail/#comment-4377</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link.  It does explain things a bit better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link.  It does explain things a bit better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://lr2.com/archives/2006/08/24/pope-sacks-astronomer-over-evolution-debate-the-daily-mail/#comment-4376</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lr2.com/archives/2006/08/24/pope-sacks-astronomer-over-evolution-debate-the-daily-mail/#comment-4376</guid>
		<description>The fact that Fr. Coyne was sacked is accurate.  The conclusion that "contradicted the Holy Seeâ€™s endorsement of â€œintelligent designâ€ theory, which essentially backs the â€œAdam and Eveâ€ theory of creation." is ridiculous and inaccurate.

The following article gives a better understanding of the Pope's and the Church's position:  http://ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2005c/072905/072905h.php

The published reports of the Pope's weekend discussion of evolution will help clarify further.

Popularity: 3%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Fr. Coyne was sacked is accurate.  The conclusion that &#8220;contradicted the Holy Seeâ€™s endorsement of â€œintelligent designâ€ theory, which essentially backs the â€œAdam and Eveâ€ theory of creation.&#8221; is ridiculous and inaccurate.</p>
<p>The following article gives a better understanding of the Pope&#8217;s and the Church&#8217;s position:  <a href="http://ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2005c/072905/072905h.php" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/ncronline.org');">http://ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2005c/072905/072905h.php</a></p>
<p>The published reports of the Pope&#8217;s weekend discussion of evolution will help clarify further.</p>
<p>Popularity: 3%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
